[WikiEN-l] News agencies are not RSs

[Nathan]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:33 PM, <wjhonson at aol.com> wrote:

>
>  But explain how naming them would have endangered them any further than
> they already were.? How is their name a bargaining chip or whatever the
> logic is.
>
>
>
>
Do you understand why having a famous person captive, and being part of the
24 hour news cycle, is different from having a low-profile prisoner whom no
one knows is in captivity? If so, then you'll agree that transforming the
latter into the former is not necessarily a good idea?

Nathan