[WikiEN-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

[Fred Bauder]

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:17 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Dalton
>> <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/6/27 stevertigo <stvrtg at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>
>>
>>> > Thomas, the distinctions you present -- that dispute resolution has
>>> public
>>> > and private dimensions, and that these different dimensions of
>>> dispute
>>> > resolution require different technological formats -- is unknown to
>>> me.
>>> Is
>>> > there policy in which the necessity for these distinctions is
>>> outlined?
>>>
>>> I never said it was necessary, I just said that's the way it is.
>>> Unless you can describe a problem with a current system, I see no
>>> reason to change it.
>>>
>>
>> You could start a thread called  "if it ain't broke don't fix it" and
>> there
>> we can debate whether the axiom applies to anything other than
>> appliances.
>> :-)
>
> I would actually suggest two lists, if we could do this -
>
> One, an announce-only list which summarized ongoing dispute resolution
> (arbcom cases, RFCs, community discussions of note elsewhere) for
> those who find following all the threads on-wiki daunting with real
> life time constraints.
>
> Two, discussion.
>
> Perhaps one list, but a regular posting of the announcements, but I
> think some people would be more interested in just announcements.  I
> would participate in both, but I think that giving some people the
> option to just get the announcements is more respectful of their
> bandwidth...
>
>
> --
> -george william herbert
> george.herbert at gmail.com
>

I think this is a good refinement of the idea.

Fred