[WikiEN-l] Daily Mail article on Sam Blacketer case

[AGK]

>
> Gross inaccuracies that harm our public image? Not that I can see. Some of
> the details are wrong - number of ArbCom cases for instance, but that's
> pretty irrelevant to the story or indeed our reputation. Likewise with the
> relationship between Wikimedia UK and the Foundation.


(Belated reply to Andrew's post of one day ago.)

The article certainly doesn't give a positive impression of us. It's quite
clear to me that there are inaccuracies and that the article harms our
public image. Wikipedia gets quite enough stick for being "totally
unreliable" (and such) without the Mail spreading incorrect information
about how we operate.

AGK