[WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too deletionist

[Carcharoth]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Carcharoth<carcharothwp at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi-Ville
> Heiskanen<cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> More seriously - relatively speaking - I think we actually
>> do have quite a few emperors and the like favorite rides
>> as articles of their own. Granted horse are not generally
>> considered pets.
>
> Deletionists, look away now...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals

<sob>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_births_by_year
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_deaths_by_year

That is ridiculous category use.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_amputees
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_lobsters

And going full-circle:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_Presidential_pets

Carcharoth