[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia:Paradoxes

[WJhonson at aol.com]

If by "light" you mean the wave portion, than I'd probably agree with you,  
that it's not "matter".  However "light" is also a photon, which as a  
particle, I would have to say is "matter", massless or no.
 
I seem to recall however this little thing called the particle-wave duality 
 of nature.  That is every particle is also a packet of energy with a  
wave-form and you could think of it as if they are constantly switching from a  
particle to a wave and back again.  At any rate, when the total amount of  
matter in the universe is calculated, don't they include as well loose 
electrons  and photons in that equation?  As well as neutrinos for that matter.
 
I'd still be interested in an authority you could cite that specifically  
states that other than energy and matter there is this third entity that is  
neither one, which you seem to be claiming.
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/27/2009 7:20:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
stvrtg at gmail.com writes:


Well  not all things are "matter." Light, for example. 

**************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy 
Steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823322x1201398723/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=Jul
yExcfooterNO62)