[WikiEN-l] Bible websites

[wjhonson at aol.com]

 We can quote autobiographies in terms of what the deity has to say about themselves.
It's a primary source, not original research when quoted.? Only original in the first-form.
That is, we can't publish it by itself, but we can quote it, with other sources.




Or it's true, which would mean that it was dictated by God himself.
Wouldn't that make it original research?



 


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Manske <magnusmanske at googlemail.com>
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Mon, Jul 6, 2009 2:40 pm
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Bible websites










On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Charles
> Matthews<charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, why is a Wikipedia article citing a Bible verse?
>
> Because in spite of their dominant representation, its the Wikipedia
> and not the Atheistpedia.

Come to think of it:

The bible is either wrong, in which case it shouldn't be cited.

Or it's true, which would mean that it was dictated by God himself.
Wouldn't that make it original research?

/me ducks

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l