[WikiEN-l] Interesting article on restored copyrights in US works between...

[geni]

2009/1/16  <WJhonson at aol.com>:
> The ruling did *not* repeal sweat-of-the-brow.  What it did was state  that
> your work must have some creativity, some originality, some non-obvious
> content in order to enjoy copyright protection.

Which effectively kicks out sweat of the brow. Sweat of the brow is on
it's own non creative.


-- 
geni