[WikiEN-l] Interesting article on restored copyrights in US works between...

[WJhonson at aol.com]

<<In a message dated 1/14/2009 9:43:10 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
saintonge at telus.net writes:

You are  only right to a limited extent.  While it makes sense to say 
that a  given picture was from the Corbis archives, acknowledging only 
that  reinforces the notion that they have the proper copyrights.  If  
Corbis fails to give proper credit to its source that fact too needs to  
be noted.>>
 
I agree.  A credit like "Credit: Corbis, which does not specify it's  own 
source and which possibly lacks copyright..."
 
;)~~~
 
Will
 
 
**************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's 
capital.(http://www.aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000027)