[WikiEN-l] Interesting article on restored copyrights in US works between...

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 1/14/2009 12:33:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
dgerard at gmail.com writes:

This  does not square with copyright law in any way. It's also arguable
morally,  given their clear and blatant attempts to enclose the  public
domain.>>


------------------------
David that isn't relevant.
Copyright and Credit are two seperate items.  We need to discuss them  
seperately.
You don't Credit the Copyright holder.  You Credit your source, which  may or 
may not be a copyright holder.
 
You credit where *you* got it from.  You even "Credit" public domain  sources 
such as "the Monroe County courthouse" which holds no copyrights on  anything 
whatsoever.
 
"Credit" doesn't need to know who holds the copyright, you are merely  
stating what your own source was.  "Credit" has nothing to do with "Law",  it has to 
do with "Normal scholarly citation methods"
 
Will Johnson
 
 
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)