[WikiEN-l] To boldy delete what no one had deleted before!

[Ken Arromdee]

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Noah Salzman wrote:
> Makes sense to me. If the "articles for deletion" process is usurped  
> by the "articles for purgatory" process then it transforms the debate  
> entirely. If you keep losing at chess than change the game to  
> checkers, rather than continuing to complain about losing at chess.

It's already happened, with articles for deletion replaced by "merging" on the
grounds that merging is not deletion.