[WikiEN-l] NOR contradicts NPOV

[WJhonson at aol.com]

<<In a message dated 1/8/2009 7:06:51 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
snowspinner at gmail.com writes:

I mean,  I'm not saying secondary sources are useless. I'm just saying,   
"knowledge published in reliable secondary sources" and  "encyclopedia"  
are not equivalent. That's a statement on a  line-by-line, fact-by-fact  
scale.>>
 
Okay but you're talking past me, because I never espoused this position  
either.
In fact quite the opposite.  If I had I would have *no room  whatsoever* for 
primary sources right?
No sense in quoting a primary source if the knowledge had already been  
published in a secondary source.
I'm sure you can see this.
 
Will Johnson
 
 



**************New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://news.aol.com?ncid=emlcntusnews00000002)