[WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too deletionist
Emily Monroe
bluecaliocean at me.com
Sun Aug 9 02:24:35 UTC 2009
> Trying to hammer every peg into one of just two holes is bound to
> cause problems.
Then there's the issue of people who are inter-sexed (born with mixed
or absent gender-specific organs, example being [[Jim Sinclair]]),
genderfuck (intentionally ignoring gender-specific cultural
expectations), cross-dressers, and generally anybody else who doesn't
fit neatly into "male" or "female". This isn't a representation of
Wikipedia, but society in general.
Emily
On Aug 8, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Bryan Derksen wrote:
> WJhonson at aol.com wrote:
>> About "Women" on Wikipedia, I think "famous" is probably
>> problematic, like
>> "list of short women", is too much based on a judgement call.
>
> Heck, in a few cases the "Women" classification might prove to be
> based
> on a judgement call. The panoply of transgender classifications and
> how
> they change over time and culture is beyond me. Trying to hammer every
> peg into one of just two holes is bound to cause problems.
>
> Not saying it wouldn't be nice to categorize those that _aren't_ edge
> cases, mind you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list