[WikiEN-l] Notability in Wikipedia

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 4/27/2009 3:40:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time,  
doc.wikipedia at ntlworld.com writes:

If we  can agree something is the sensible thing to do, then we do it. 
That's  what IAR is all about, and why "multiple third-party sources" may 
be a  good rule of thumb, but, like most rules, must never become Holy 
Writ.  (See WP:IAR).>>


-------------------------
 
So we let creep in such chestnuts as "King Arthur is the ancestor of the  
present Queen Elizabeth" because this is repeated on 12 websites of "local  
genealogy" societies.
 
If there is some specific case about which you're on, maybe you might bring 
 it up directly.  Otherwise the proper place to thrash it out would be on  
the Reliable Sources discussion board maybe.
 
For the examples given so far however, I'm just not seeing it.  If  some 
architectural marvel is so marvelous, then it would be written up, outside  of 
some amateur enthusiast's web page.
 
Will Johnson
 
 
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220572846x1201387511/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=
Aprilfooter427NO62)