[WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Board statement regarding biographies of l...

[WJhonson at aol.com]

I don't feel comfortable with a statement like the Foundation chooses what  
sort of method they want.  That sounds an awful lot like structure "coming  
down from on-high" instead of "up from the community".
 
If this is to remain a community-driven enterprise, then whatever decisions 
 are made, should be made with the consensus of the community and not 
directed by  a benevolent closed oligarchy.
 
I agree that some *specific* details of how a person was verified could  
remain private.  It is rather the method, scope, and result that should be  
made public so many eyes can self-validate that it's a method that is not  
trivial to fool.
 
Will
 
 
**************Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219799634x1201361008/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubl
eclick.net%2Fclk%3B214133440%3B36002254%3Bj)