[WikiEN-l] Edward Doran

[Carcharoth]

Great work!

Now, to play devil's advocate, at what point does this become original
research and synthesis? My view is that it depends on how reproducible
and verifiable the information and logic is. If someone else (the
reader) can trace the same logic through the same paperwork that you
did, is that sufficient?

Or should what you've done there be published and then referenced?

Of course, the sources claiming the birth year as 1892 shouldn't be
removed entirely. Just in case and to stop people changing it when
they see a discrepancy.

Carcharoth

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM,  <WJhonson at aol.com> wrote:
> Using a trick I patented ;)  I noticed that Ed was elected in  1931.
> So scanning the incoming passenger lists I found this
>
> _http://content.ancestry.com/Browse/view.aspx?dbid=1518&path=Southampton%2c+
> England.1934.06.Berengaria.6&fn=Edward&ln=Doran&st=r&pid=23697689&rc=&zp=50_
>
> (http://content.ancestry.com/Browse/view.aspx?dbid=1518&path=Southampton,+England.1934.06.Berengaria.6&fn=Edward&ln=Doran&st=r&pid=23697689&rc=&zp=50)
>
> Arriving from New York to Southampton 22 Jun 1934 (note that date)
>
> Edward Doran, age 49, House of Commons, Member of Parliament
>
> So there ya go, pretty clear case.
>
> Will Johnson
>
>
> **************Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219799634x1201361008/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubl
> eclick.net%2Fclk%3B214133440%3B36002254%3Bj)
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>