[WikiEN-l] Citizendium vs. Wikipedia
Chet Hoover
chet.hoover at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 21 18:43:48 UTC 2009
Here's why Citizendium is far better:
* It's more open... everyone's identities are known, there are no sockpuppets, there is none of the absurd overhead that anonymity entails.
* It's more serious... vital articles come first... Pokemon comes last. Only in many years from now will we begin to see trivial articles surface: obscure films, unknown actors & etc.
*This seriousness attracts Academics. Citizendium's slow growth is actually an incentive to serious-minded writers. It means the place is clear of the nutters and fans that Wikipedia has.
*The place is in the hands of "writers" and not an army of "1600 administrators". Can you imagine writing for Wikipedia as an expert and knowing that your bosses are in high school, maybe university, and only occasionally over 35 years old?
*Because real identities are used, less rules and guideline creep exists. It's more about the material.
*All the computer guys are at Wikipedia because they like the technical aspects of Wikipedia where you have to master a lingo and comply with MOS (don't ask!). These guys see everything in terms of percents anyhow, and don't have the kind of discerning mind that understands concepts and themes & etc. With them out of the way, you get a healthier bunch of writers who show up at Citizendium.
*Citizendium's difficult entrance exam is not really all that difficult. It's a sure-fire way of keeping out those who are not prepared to edit an encyclopedia and frankly, I love that!
Citizendium can just hang on, and stick around, because it's far less about its success over Wikipedia than it is about an environment in which serious-minded people with the werewithal can write about important subjects.
Chet
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list