[WikiEN-l] We've been overtaken.

[Ian Woollard]

So far as I can tell from percentage breakdowns by country in Alexa,
the Chinese go to hudong and zh.wikipedia.org equally often- virtually
the same number of page hits. However, hudong ranks 112 and
wikipedia.org ranks 66 in China, which tells you that a lot of people
are reading the other languages more than Chinese.

On 21/04/2009, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Scientia Potentia est <bibliomaniac_15 at yahoo.com>:
>> I'm not too concerned. Their notability standards seem to be very loose,
>> and they have >few of the trappings that we emphasize: BLP, neutrality,
>> reliable sourcing, brilliant prose, >etc. The software is also much more
>> focused on social networking. Furthermore, Hudong >is not free.
>>
>
> Apart from the neutrality our readers and most of our writers tend not
> to care about that. The integration with a degree of social networking
> tools is also interesting They have a forum linked off their main page
> among other things.
>
> --
> geni
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>


-- 
-Ian Woollard

We live in an imperfectly imperfect world. Life in a perfectly
imperfect world would be *much* better. Life in an imperfectly perfect
world would be pretty ghastly though.