[WikiEN-l] Saying no to new unreferenced BLPs

[doc]

I did read what you said, and it is bad enough.

The notion that "anyone [with xn edits] can review", and no admin can 
revoke, makes the right less scrutinised that rollback - that has the 
effect of making the quality control utterly useless.

That someone has xn edits only means that they have not (yet) behaved in 
a manner to get blocked. It in no sense is equal to clue, 
perceptiveness, or diligence.

The problem with widespread flagging is that in order to prevent 
backlogs, you will be under pressure to maximise the reviewers, and give 
the reviewers incentives to rack up numerous reviews per minute. That is 
   inconsistent with useful scrutiny.

wjhonson at aol.com wrote:
> I did not suggest doc that "anyone can review".
> Review what I said again.
> I said that established users can review, that it should be an 
> automatic right at a certain point and that admins cannot remove that 
> right.
> 
> That is quite different from "anyone".
> 
> 
>