[WikiEN-l] Linking Dates

Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson at gmail.com
Sat Oct 18 15:47:23 UTC 2008


On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Delirium <delirium at hackish.org> wrote:
> Also, the year articles, by contrast with the date articles, often have
> non-list background information relevant for the article they're linked
> from. See, for example, the excellent article on [[1345]].
>
> -Mark

I have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion, I just wanted to
say that, Holy crap!, that's a great article! Seriously, how can we
have a far superior article on 1345 than 1945?

--Oskar



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list