[WikiEN-l] Using Wikipedia unlikely to result in collapse of knowledge

[geni]

2008/10/7 Philip Sandifer <snowspinner at gmail.com>:
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 5:54 PM, geni wrote:
>
>> 2008/10/7 Philip Sandifer <snowspinner at gmail.com>:
>>> That was always the core of the issue with spoiler warnings - they
>>> made articles worse, not better.
>>
>> Unproven. Spoiler warnings had the advantage that people actually put
>> in some spoilers.
>
> They also organized articles around hiding spoilers. But more
> importantly, spoiler warnings just looked stupid. In a fundamental
> sense, they looked non-serious.
>
> -Phil

So does having edit histories with names like snowspinner in them.


-- 
geni