[WikiEN-l] How's our coverage of medications?

[Thomas Dalton]

> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is only one way to prove any of that, though, and that's giving
>> it a go. If we only make the flagged rev the default version for
>> articles that are currently (semi-)protected keeping up with the
>> sighting would be easy - that's the version of the proposal that
>> should be completely uncontroversial.
>
> You would think— But thats only true if the resistance is driven by a
> risk analysis, it's not true for resistance driven by either a hard
> philosophical objection (The "unwiki" position taken by many in the
> discussions) or due to an attempt to thwart change in general. In
> either of these cases you could demonstrate that it works great and
> those opinions would not change. Moreover, the possibility that a test
> may be successful and dispel fears is a reason to oppose testing for
> opponents whom care about things other than success.

But flagged revisions for currently protected pages is more wiki than
protected pages...