[WikiEN-l] What to do about our writing quality?

[Ray Saintonge]

David Gerard wrote:
> I don't see a problem with articles going through a cycle of
> well-written -> more details -> copyedited -> well-written. Of course,
> as Ian points out, domain knowledge is important in the copyeditor!
> (Or at least a talk page note "I've copyedited for flow and structure,
> please fix any important detail I may have messed up" - an express
> statement of non-OWNership.)
This would support the notion that we need more sophisticated algorithms 
for evaluating articles,  style and content being only two of the more 
important qualities to be tracked.

Ec