[WikiEN-l] Unreliable sources, or no sources at all?

[Daniel R. Tobias]

On 25 Mar 2008 at 00:03:47 UTC, "David Gerard" <dgerard at gmail.com  
wrote:

> Which would be you falling afoul of the fallacy that "all A is B
> therefore all B is A." You need to think why in this case you're
> wrong.

The lesson I got out of it was "If A has a bigger and more powerful 
clique of friends and supporters than B, then by definition A is 
right and B is a troll," but what do A and B equal in *your* 
explanation?

-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/