[WikiEN-l] Unreliable sources, or no sources at all?

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 3/25/2008 5:19:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
dgerard at gmail.com writes:

[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] is itself ...
not a reliable source.  It's a guideline, and one with truck-sized
holes in  it.>>


---------------------
That's a bit poetic, so I'm sure you mean it a bit  tongue-in-cheek.
We should employ common sense when citing policy/guidelines as our  reasoning 
behind some action.
In general mass-deletions might invoke DICK against you.
It's a fine-line.  I'm certainly fine with the original poster  deleting *a* 
source and posting to the talk page the reason why.  But if  they go on a 
rampage with a meat cleaver in a cowshed they are asking for  trouble.
 
Will



**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL 
Home.      
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom00030000000001)