[WikiEN-l] Unreliable sources, or no sources at all?
Andrew Gray
shimgray at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 13:54:49 UTC 2008
On 23/03/2008, bobolozo <bobolozo at yahoo.com> wrote:
> An extreme example of this, but... suppose some
> spammer goes through and adds references to 1000
> articles in random unsourced paragraphs, with the
> source given being
> mortgage-refinance-online-low-prices.biz, totally off
> topic from any of the articles. We're now not allowed
> to remove this spam without gutting all of these
> articles or spending hundreds of hours digging up sources?
No, of course you're allowed to remove that. This is a strawman -
there is a very major distinction between maliciously-added spam links
and good-faith but-not-very-good actual sources.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list