[WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee

[Thomas Dalton]

On 21/03/2008, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any point why we even have arbcom? They do not seem to be doing
>  much of resolving disputes lately. Granted they accept cases and close them.
>  But by the time case is closed very little of the dispute is been resolved.
>  Often disputes continue as if the RFAR wasn't filed.
>
>  They often do not respond to inquires in a timely fashion or at all. They
>  ignore evidence or at least make statements that are directly contradicted
>  by hard evidence. The remedies they pass generally are common-sense
>  statements and nothing more. For example, they will say that meatpupperary
>  is disruptive but they will not pass remedies in prevention of it.
>
>  They are not fair. They give a lot of leeway to long term trolls yet they do
>  not give a fraction of that to good standing users. For example they will
>  decline a case if is is not adequately engulfed in disruption. If you want
>  your case to be heard by arbcom you need to be revert waring left right or
>  else you will not be given much attention even if you exhaust dispute
>  resolution.
>
>  Maybe it is time to dissolve arbcom.

If you wish you make accusations against ArbCom, you're going to need
to be specific. Vague, general accusations will just be ignored.