[WikiEN-l] What is happening to the community

[Oskar Sigvardsson]

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Kurt Maxwell Weber <kmw at armory.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24, Steve Bennett wrote:
>  > Do we want an article on every distant object, no matter how little is
>  > known on it?
>
>  Yes.  If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
>
>
>  > I don't think we want an article on every single arrowhead, pottery
>  > fragment or piece of flint.
>
>  We do.  If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
>
>
>  > >  *"31 million CAS registry numbers have been allocated for chemical
>  > > compounds."
>  >
>  > We could do  with some lists, but an article on every compound is
>  > probably too much, when so little can be said for so many of them.
>
>  No, it's not.  If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.

This is quite an extremist opinion, with which many people would have
huge problems.

I exist. But I'm not a legitimate subject for an article.

--Oskar