[WikiEN-l] What is happening to the community

[Kurt Maxwell Weber]

On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:24, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Do we want an article on every distant object, no matter how little is
> known on it? 

Yes.  If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.

> I don't think we want an article on every single arrowhead, pottery
> fragment or piece of flint.

We do.  If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.

> >  *"31 million CAS registry numbers have been allocated for chemical
> > compounds."
>
> We could do  with some lists, but an article on every compound is
> probably too much, when so little can be said for so many of them.

No, it's not.  If it exists, it's a legitimate subject for an article.
-- 
Kurt Weber
<kmw at armory.com>