[WikiEN-l] Jimmy Wales in the news

[Screamer]

Giacomo M-Z wrote:
> Frankly, "the evidence" holds no water, by implication it is slanderous, in
> real fact it amounts to nothing. Jimbo - filed an expense, it was rejected,
> he paid - where is the story? It happens to executives every day of the week
> everywhere, nothing criminal,nothing remarkable.
>
> Giacomo
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Oldak Quill <oldakquill at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On 06/03/2008, Giacomo M-Z <solebaciato at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> The simple fact of the matter here is that those so keen to ruin J
>>>       
>> Wales,
>>     
>>>  either have to present some better evidence than this, or shut up, and
>>>  tender an apology with their resignations - and pray he accepts it.
>>>       
>> Third "shut up" today on these lists. Is it really necessary?
>>
>> --
>> Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>   
Yes, exactly.  I find this instance of expenses here, very extremely 
forgivable.  And I do not see where any offense was done.  Everyone from 
Jimmy to the Foundation was doing their job.  Requesting reimbursement 
is not a crime, and not something unsavory.

./scream