[WikiEN-l] ArbCom Legislation

[Charlotte Webb]

On 6/18/08, Daniel R. Tobias <dan at tobias.name> wrote:
> And in this case, the remedy was attached to a case that didn't seem,
> on its face, to have anything whatsoever to do with the issue the
> remedy was addressing; it was a case about the formatting of
> reference quotes, about as "wiki-wonky" a topic as you can imagine,
> and got very little attention even from those who regularly follow
> what the ArbCom is up to, compared to some more drama-intensive
> ArbCom cases going on at the same time.

Yes any page titled "requests for arbitration/footnoted quotes" is
almost guaranteed from day one to be dismissed as shit nobody cares
about by anyone who might be aware of it. Looking at the result I
can't decide whether this is Sophoclean irony or Epeian brilliance.

—C.W.