[WikiEN-l] User:FritzpollBot creating millions of new

[Todd Allen]

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
> <ref>precognitive vision</ref>
>
> Does that work? I don't have proof that its true, just a strong suspicion.
> It seems unlikely to me that two million articles that have gone 7-odd years
> without creation are going to be heavily trafficked by editors once they are
> created en masse.  Of course it does make it easier for IP editors to
> contribute information on these places, which is a good thing. But by and
> large, I think it will take many years for these articles to evolve into
> something useful.
>
> Regarding the comparison to Rambot - not something I know a whole lot about.
> Rambot created articles based on incorporated communities in the US using
> census data, right? 30,000 articles according to Tim Starling and 90,000
> according to MBisanz. Rambot ran 5 years ago, and the articles are about US
> townships - and yet a fair number of them, according to what I've seen and
> the debate on the proposal, are still not heavily modified ([[Nemacolin,
> Pennsylvania]] is an example). I think you can see how a direct comparison
> between these and the Fritzpoll bot-created articles doesn't really work.
> Articles about 100,000 towns in Africa are somewhat less likely to be edited
> than the Rambot articles were when they were created (at a time when they
> represented a significant portion of a much smaller 'pedia).
>
> All that said, I'm not saying it shouldn't be done - just that it has less
> value than some seem to have assigned to it.
>
> Nathan
>
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 12:12 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2008/6/1 Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com>:
>>
>> > How does simply having what is basically a placeholder entry for each
>> > town/village/city etc. alleviate systemic bias? Most of these articles
>> will
>> > be ignored completely after creation,
>>
>> I think you're dead wrong there. How many Rambot articles are untouched?
>>
>> >  Creating 2 million more articles that won't be touched for a decade
>>
>> [citation needed]
>>
>> - d.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>

Alright, so here's the "it shouldn't be done", and unless I see
significant consensus I'll happily block the bot if tried. Let's let
real people write articles on subjects of actual value, please, and if
it takes longer, at least the results will be of some reasonable
quality.

-- 
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.