[WikiEN-l] SlimVirgin and CheckUser leaks

[SlimVirgin]

On 7/20/08, Fayssal F. <szvest at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  a) Lar is wrong. He should not have communicated CU findings with his wife.
>  Policy is clear on that.
>
>  b) SlimVirgin, you are wrong when you think that there should be a
>  *good*valid reason for a CU; a valid reason is sufficient.

I agree. But he had NO reason to check Crum once he discovered that
Wiktumnus was an editor who is known to him. Once he knew that, there
was no reason to proceed with the check of Crum. Lar was on a fishing
trip.