[WikiEN-l] Fwd: [Wikiquality-l] Current Status

[Voice of All]

Everybody does not want it. There *are* plenty of dissenters, some of which
are actually informed. So it is not that simple.

Also, one of the reasons people opposed rollback was due to the bureaucracy
crap. I opposed it as I'd rather it be granted automatically by the
software, since all it does is speed up something people can already do.


Steve Summit wrote:
> 
> Tonay Sidaway wrote:
>> On 14/01/2008, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The FlaggedRevs code shudders forward!
>>
>> Sorry to be so pessimistic, but since we've  taken more than two years
>> as a community to accept a trivial revision of the software that
>> permits non-administrators to revert vandalism in a single step, and
>> we're still wobbly about that, what possibility does this large-scale
>> and revolutionary change have of ever being accepted on English
>> Wikipedia?
> 
> Yes, I'd say you're being unduly pessimistic.  Rollback was a
> trivial, unimportant change that a few people wanted.  Flagged
> revisions is an important, beneficial change that everybody wants.
> There *is* a difference (I hope).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fwd%3A--Wikiquality-l--Current-Status-tp14802354p14804973.html
Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at Nabble.com.