[WikiEN-l] So, has the need for consensus in wikipedia been eliminated?

[charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com]

doc wrote

> If arbcom's purpose is to protect itself against whinging, then it 
> should certainly not take on this case (or many other cases for that 
> matter).

The usual criterion is the likelihood of improving matters, rather than making them worse.

Charles

-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam