[WikiEN-l] Sorted

[Andrew Gray]

On 23/02/2008, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:

> You appear to have mistaken your personal viewpoint for a neutral
>  viewpoint. This is of course an eternal hazard.

Neutrality is very hard here... our normal "talk around the issue"
approach doesn't quite work for a binary "include or don't include"
question.

A lot of the problems with invoking NPOV here are that we're treating
"our" viewpoint (the status quo ante bellum) as by definition neutral,
and I'm not sold on that.

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk