No subject

they were actually of any significance, such as under the Ilkhanids (later
Safawids) or some periods of Ottoman rule. Undue focus upon a minority
tradition in the manner the article currently does isn't particularly
balanced. There's been a tendancy to compare this article with others like
[[Buddha]], [[Jesus]], [[Krishna]] etc. who all have had substantial and
diverse traditions of depiction throughout most of history. Such comparison
is not sensible, however, for that very reason.