[WikiEN-l] Sorted

[Wily D]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway at gmail.com> wrote:
> We actually have an article , "Depictions of Muhammad".  Illustrations
>  are greatly overrated in my opinion.
>
>  Why don't we just put all the illustrations into the "depictions"
>  article, say that they're there in the other article, and get on with
>  the rest of our lives secure in the knowledge that yet another
>  Alexandrian immolation has been averted by the use of commonsense.
>
As someone who's been following the debate on images in the Muhammad
article for the last year or so, it's my definite impression that few
editors from either side are likely to find this an acceptable
comprimise.

But feel free to suggest it at [[Talk:Muhammad/images]]

Cheers
WilyD