[WikiEN-l] BLPs in the papers

[Raphael Wegmann]

Raphael Wegmann schrieb:
 > David Gerard schrieb:
 >> What you mean is "I can't get my way, no-one agrees with me and I
 >> can't produce any evidence for my assertions when called on them - It
 >> must be an ADMIN CONSPIRACY."
 >>
 >
 > Do I really have to guide you to:
 >
 > 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=192159520&oldid=192136846
 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad/images
 >
 > It happens all the time, that admins use their privileges to gain
 > advantage in a content dispute. I complained about it many times,
 > but no admin ever lost his admin status over it. The only reaction
 > I usually get is: "The admin should have asked another person to
 > do it for him."
 >
 > RfCs on admins don't work either.
 > In-groups usually defend each other against out-groups.
 > That isn't conspiracy, it's sociology.
 >

David Gerard schrieb:
> http://www.slweekly.com/index.cfm?do=article.details&id=37C948F3-14D1-13A2-9FB530596FADE2A6
> 
> Nice one to Cool Hand Luke.
> 

That's exactly what I expected.
Divert the topic when it becomes inconvenient.

-- 
Raphael