[WikiEN-l] Foundation audit
saintonge at telus.net
Tue Feb 12 00:33:32 UTC 2008
> On Feb 11, 2008 2:20 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It isn't "misleading"
> Maybe it isn't, but Ant stated pretty confidently that she knows it is
> In this case, if the expense was from restricted funds, then I think
> she's right that it was misleading, though less misleading than 2006,
> when this expense was filed under "Other". I'd certainly ask Mona or
> whoever it is that produced the financial statements why it's filed
> under unrestricted funds. Maybe she or whoever can explain it, then
> Ant wouldn't have to go saying that the financial statements she voted
> to approve are misleading. Unless there are other parts she also
> knows to be misleading..
"Misleading" because of the application of hindsight is not on apar with
More information about the WikiEN-l