[WikiEN-l] Foundation audit
philippebeaudette at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 23:45:31 UTC 2008
In my never-humble opinion, this is dangerously close to trolling.
It's intellectually dishonest to take what Anthere said: "I know it is
misleading, I am not so happy with that
either." and then portray that as her approving a financial that she didn't
She clearly understood it enough to have an objection to the way it was
grouped. That doesn't mean she is obliged to vote down the entire financial
because she doesn't like the way ONE line item is rolled up.
You owe her an apology. You seriously mis-stated what it is that Anthere
I repeat my premise: Anthony, your argument is intellectually dishonest, and
thus on shaky ground.
From: "Anthony" <wikimail at inbox.org>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:58 PM
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Foundation audit
> That's all fine and well, but if she receives advice from someone and
> is happy with their explanation, then she shouldn't later say she
> isn't happy with it and that it's misleading.
> I don't have a problem with the statement. I have a problem with
> someone voting to approve a statement that they don't understand.
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
More information about the WikiEN-l