[WikiEN-l] NOR contradicts NPOV

[WJhonson at aol.com]

I already, in one of my last posts pointed out that this appears  flawed.
 
The mere fact that a person is speaking about their own work, does not  
necessarily make their own words primary.
I.E. I can do a book review, on my book.  The fact that I do it on my  own 
book, doesn't make my review a primary source.
 
Will Johnson
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/28/2008 8:07:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
snowspinner at gmail.com writes:

No. I'm  claiming that, due to the current phrasing of NOR, any author  
on a  specialist topic who has been criticized and has defended  
themselves  to any extent is in the unfortunate position of having  
their defense  not be suitable for inclusion under our current  policies.


**************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, 
Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. 
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)