[WikiEN-l] Catscan versus :category:

[Jay Litwyn]

From: "Lukasz Bolikowski" <L.Bolikowski at icm.edu.pl>
(...)
>> This feels to me essentially the same issue as with the category
>> tree: while some might prefer a strict IS-A relationship for
>> categorization, in practice we have to accept that all that category >> 
>> membership means is some kind of hopefully human-
>> understandable relationship.
(...)

A bug or two is in the sub-category tool (+) that is on cat pages -- as 
compared to catscan, which was written into those cat pages with 
enhancements. I think that's what the author means by "snafu" on catscan. 
Catscan can make a tree out of [[:category:neurology]] that includes more 
information.