[WikiEN-l] Scientists told "publish in Wikipedia or else"

[Jay Litwyn]

Hefty point for the writers who do not get a new article accepted
and resort to promoting their web page (no self reference) or usenet 
article -- get warned and then wonder what is left to do, here (hordes, of 
course, and you gotta look). Looking at it this way, "Nature" might seem out 
of order, and you never can tell if someone might gravitate to tweaking 
stuff out of their field. (I'm a stylist. Supposed to an 
eventualist...stuborn, maybe. [Okay...one more piece of spam control, belay 
concerns with Jeremy Hanson that I can not directly support, ATM, then I try 
to colour that fractal that looks like a cat if I can find it --booger--  
lost drive for testing music. OH! I haven't done any caffeine in ten hours. 
Maybe I can clear my spam kyuu, after all.]).

Anybody welcomed somebody with suggestbot?
_______
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do 
it. --Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

From: "David Gerard" <dgerard at gmail.com>
> 2008/12/16 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>:
>
>> Sounds like a fantastic idea. Only problem seems to be that they
>> publish the wikipedia articles/summaries before the papers, it needs
>> to be the other way around so the paper can be a reference for the
>> summary.
>
>
> * '''d''', nn, v, auto, spam - ~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l