[WikiEN-l] Florence

[AGK]

>
> *Wonders what hopes we have if we can't even keep the bio of someone we
> know well up to date*


I think it's simply a case of "somebody else will update this," rather than
an inherent failure of our editing model. Articles do, by-and-large, get
kept very up to date.

*AGK*

2008/8/14 geni <geniice at gmail.com>

> 2008/8/14 Kwan Ting Chan <ktc at ktchan.info>:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 21:24 -0400, Casey Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> *wonders why people look to enwiki articles for internal Foundation
> information*
> >
> > *Wonders what hopes we have if we can't even keep the bio of someone we
> > know well up to date*
> >
> > KTC
>
> Knowing well is original research. But yes aside from really notable
> people and things are articles tend not to be totally up to date. This
> isn't generally a problem. Being say a season behind on a footballer
> or missing a uni prof's latest publications isn't a critical flaw.
>
>
> --
> geni
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>