[WikiEN-l] [WikiEn-l] Another BLP deletion... Why?

[Nathan]

Actually, I should revise - practically everyone, including Arbs and a
couple of Board members, feel that this change should be made to policy. I
must be missing something I guess.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:

> It gets better - there is a proposal on WT:BLP to change the normal
> operation of a consensus discussion so that, for BLP articles, its
> backwards. If this proposal makes its way into policy, the outcome will be
> this: if an editor nominates a BLP article for deletion, and no consensus
> for deletion is achieved, it will be deleted. I personally can't see how
> that makes sense, but apparently a few of the folks on WT:BLP can. Maybe we
> need a new process - Articles for Keep, where all nominated articles are
> deleted unless enough people come by to make argue for keeping them.
>
> Nathan
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you mean the veracity of the threat (as opposed to whether he will
> > actually follow through)... There is a link to a blog, written by him, and
> > hosted by his law firm. That at least means he's put his name behind it more
> > or less in public.
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:53 AM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > So far it's a talk page message from a username that's made one edit,
> > > on an IP that's made one edit (yes, I looked in checkuser when
> > > forwarding it to Mike Godwin). That is NOT sufficient reason to play
> > > Chicken Little unless and until we have something resembling
> > > information.
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > > WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> > >
> >
> >
>