[WikiEN-l] While we're at it, NOR line-by-line

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 4/7/2008 11:57:14 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
snowspinner at gmail.com writes:

Actually, and this is my complaint, we currently demand that a  person
*unskilled* in the art be able to do  it.>>


--------------------------------------------------------------
That might be a change.  I do recall debating the exact language of  that 
section several months ago.  I drifted away from some policy pages for  a bit.
 
I'm sure the argument would be something like "If you cannot convince the  
reader that your ...deduction... follows, then you're not very good at writing"  
;)  Sort of an antagonistic approach, but perhaps reasonable in some  regard.
 
If you are having a particular issue, with a particular article, I'd like  to 
see it, to get a feel of the underlying philosophical issues more  
concretely.  It's sometimes hard to argue hypothetically, the cognitive  dissonance 
compels me to spend days writing up position papers for WP.
 
Will Johnson



**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.    
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)