[WikiEN-l] While we're at it, NOR line-by-line

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 4/7/2008 11:21:49 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
snowspinner at gmail.com writes:

The  issue is that presenting that research is always somewhat original -
that  is, the statement "This presentation of statements is  substantively
equivalent to the statements in this source" is not a trivial  one - it's an
argument that does not come directly and transparently from  the original
source. Summary is original  research.>>


-------------------------------------------------------------
We specifically cover summary in our policy language.
That is, we specifically allow it, as part of the editorial process.
Thus, even *if* you'd consider the process of summarizing to be OR, we  allow 
this particular form of OR.
 
Will Johnson



**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.    
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)