[WikiEN-l] Widespread disagreement with Wikipedia:Verifiability
WJhonson at aol.com
WJhonson at aol.com
Tue Apr 1 17:26:43 UTC 2008
In a message dated 4/1/2008 12:35:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
arromdee at rahul.net writes:
Asking that someone contact a source in this case 1) probably won't work and
2) isn't going to produce more accurate results than just believing the
person
who said the bridge has traffic. It's purely a bureaucratic step which
produces no benefit other than that we can say that our rule has been
followed.>>
-------------------
I have never suggested they "contact a source".
What I have suggested is that you *may* contact a source *in order to* get
them to re-publish a new statement. Contact alone is not sufficient.
Many times people will say "so and so emailed me", we've never held emails
to be sufficient since they cannot be verified independently. The source has
to actually publish something that can be independently verified.
Will
**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL
Home.
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15&ncid=aolhom00030000000001)
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list