[WikiEN-l] What's going on? - Inquiry 2

[Anthony]

On 9/14/07, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
> Stating that a high level employee of a public charity was fired for
> theft would be quite damaging.  And without rock-solid evidence such a
> statement should probably leave out the "for theft" part.  But
> stealing from a public charity is a quite serious offense.

> Issuing a statement saying the XXX
> was fired for undisclosed reasons also damages reputations.

Which, by the way, is a good reason why XXX is probably willing to
resign rather than be fired, so as to make the statement become "XXX
has resigned for undisclosed reasons".  And if you don't have
rock-solid evidence, then getting XXX to resign saves you from a
wrongful termination lawsuit, and saves you from having to pay
unemployment benefits (which in Florida are extremely hard to get out
of based on "fired for cause").