[WikiEN-l] 3RR needs to go (was Re: Newbie biting, the 3RR, and improper labeling of vandalism)
K P
kpbotany at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 01:44:39 UTC 2007
On 9/11/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/09/2007, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wikipedia is breaking up into self-controlled sub-units quickly hey.
>
> No the Danzig issue has been around for I think a couple of years
>
>
> > Next thing we know WikiProjects will be starting up their own
> > arbitration systems! Now that will be the end. Someone with intimate
> > knowledge of a topic judging on it! I say its a great system in some
> > ways that the contributors to a page did something out of process.
> > Makes me believe in a workable community based project yet again.
>
> Mediation systems perhaps.
>
> Problem is look at the copyright rules the classical music wikiproject
> put together.
>
> I once had an interesting time dealing with people trying to stop the
> addition of more detailed maps to wikipedia by using the wikiproject
> maps style guidelines.
> --
> geni
>
Our maps are worthless, they contain insufficient political or
physical boundaries to know where anything is on the map. If I use a
wiki map, I have to use another map that has things on it. In other
words, I generally can't use a wiki map because they're worhtless.
KP
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list